We sell accessibility audits, so it would be poor form to publish a conformance badge and hope nobody checked. This page reports what our own scanner finds on this site, including what is currently failing.
| Automated score | 99 / 100 |
|---|---|
| Critical issues | 0 |
| Serious issues | 0 |
| Minor issues | 1: a redundant image alt attribute |
| Scanned | Homepage, weekly |
One minor issue remains: an image carries alt text that repeats adjacent visible text, so a screen reader announces it twice. It is on the list.
Through August 2026 this page also failed the WCAG 2.1 AA minimum contrast ratio (1.4.3) in six places, where our bronze met white. That was fixed on 2026-08-31 and the scanner now reports no contrast failures.
We target WCAG 2.1 Level AA. We are not claiming conformance with it, because of the issue above and because automated testing cannot establish conformance on its own.
Automated scanning reliably catches roughly a third of WCAG success criteria. Keyboard traps, focus order, screen-reader phrasing and whether a page actually makes sense when read aloud need a person. No independent audit of this site has been carried out, so none is claimed.
Email [email protected] and tell us what you were trying to do and what got in the way. That is treated as a defect report, not feedback, and you do not need to identify the WCAG criterion.